So you can have the key pressed and resting on the activation point, and then press it the rest of the way when you want the input to register (for instance, if you're in a game and are waiting for someone to peek around the corner). Well, not quite single-stage/two-stage trigger technology, as well as progressive triggers, have some benefits when applied to keyboards.įirst, single-stage/two-stage triggers give you (with single-stage) a single smooth press with activation point somewhere in the middle, or (with two-stage) a consistent amount of takeup then a wall that you have to break through to activate the mechanism. >we’re going even further backward with the mechanical keyboard obsession ![]() It would be too hard a sell, to the wrong audience. Perhaps if they put the touch screen on the back of the phone, and added a few side buttons for touch dexterity. in the cases where you can put a mouse down. On the whole I would say the mouse wins, that is. touch screens do allow for multi finger gestures but these are area not point controls. but now not only do you not have anything(your huge mitt) obscuring the screen, the touch zone can become very precise and it allow for much more touch dexterity with multiple buttons. The big disadvantage is that you have to work remotely, but this is easily learned. Actually come to think about it the mouse is in many ways better than touch screens. ![]() the fact that a thing designed as a proxy for touch screens due to hardware limitations works so well at the task is amazing. if you asked any one to design a controller for a first person game. no wait what am I talking about it was a huge fluke. The mouse for first person games was stroke of genius. that kind of kicks ass, but what I want to talk about is the mouse. in some ways it sucks, but in other ways.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |